আজকে সব খুলে দেখাবো-Naila Nayem Epic funny Video

[Directly Link]
Naila Nayem:Paichen Ki Apnara?

Apnara Shujog paile Chobi tulben, mon chaile checkout korben Amar ki kono privacy nai?

Parle Binoculars niya daraiya thaken Ami ki kori dekhte?

Shob shomoy checkout!

APU DRESSUP?

What do you mean by dressup?

Eta simple shirt......kichu ki dekha jasche?

Taoto ha kore gile jaschen aamake!

Aaro dekhte chai?

Facebook, google a hajar hajar chobi Aache aamar-( bakita video te dekhen)

Naila Nayem epic fun

like us for update: http://facebook.com/sajal.youtube

Check Jacqueline Mithila All videos:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLR_j-APBzhG4PnVg3kWGOoRD7XDCLpuI

The story of a monster and the insignificant bugs

It is peaceful to be able to let go of some memories. But a mother of a deceased son never finds that bliss. ‘Sadness engraves its mark’ in her every little gestures; the way she sits, the way she her voice sounds so mild, the way she absentmindedly strokes on the sofa. The poet Shamsur Rahman once wrote “in our verandas and our doorframes, in our chairs, tables, and mattresses, sadness has imprinted its melancholy.” 7 months ago when Tauki’s battered dead body was found in the muddy water of Shitalakkha River this house became engulfed in sorrow from that day. Tauki’s house is still a dark place. Narayanganj is a dark place. Tauki’s father Rafiur Rabbi is rresponsible for this. He never let anyone, from the Prime Minister to the people of Naraynganj, forget that an innocent boy was murdered. Tauki would have been 18 on last Saturday. Many people would have come to the house like today. But today I, Kaiyum Chowdhury, Ashok Karmokar, Jahid Mostafa, and the rest of us were there with profound sadness. Suddenly a boy entered the room with a tray in his hand. I was startled. For a moment I thought I was seeing Tauki; the same adorable face, the same innocent look in his eyes! The boy was Tauki’s younger brother Saki. There was a painting competition to be held at the Shahid Minar in memory of Tauki. “Why don’t you come too?” Tauki’s father was saying to his wife. “I don’t want to” she replied. Tauki’s mother Rownak Rehana’s voice sounded soft, pure and there was a calm that people get from weeping so much. “I can feel him standing beside me if I go” She said. She continued in an undertone “he used to go with me everywhere…” She absentmindedly swept her hand back and forth on the sofa as if her son was lying there and she was ruffling his hair fondly. Saki was sitting beside her. No one could say anything in reply. At one corner in the room Tauki’s old computer sat lifeless and mute. Only the flowers his friends left in the morning seemed to be talking with Tauki’s picture. The Czech novelist Milan Kundera once wrote that ‘people struggle against power, memory struggle against oblivion.’ Memory is like a candle, when the light extinguishes it leaves behind wax. The memory burns things like that. Tauki’s father is fighting against oblivion. He wants the country to remember the assailant of his son. He wants justice. He is putting him against extremely powerful people. He is putting himself against his own instinct too. People naturally want to move out of the mourning period and move on. But Rafiur Rabbi and Rownak Rehana are keeping the fight alive even if that means reopening the wound every day. They are doing it in the hope that one day the government will respond, in the hope that one day, may be one day, the whispers and mutters will explode into screams and roars of protest. They are doing it in the hope that the mafia Godfathers of Narayanganj will fall one day. In the Hollywood movie Desperado the hero avenged the death of his lover by destroying the killer godfathers. Rafiur Rabbi wants justice for his son. He is now desperate. He is standing against a powerful adversary, who has enormous wealth, power, and most of all the blessings of the highest people of the state. Rabbi is an ordinary man but he is putting up an extraordinary fight. What did Rabbi do? He built up a movement against the corruption and crimes in the city. He was also an organizer and leader of the National Resources Preservation Committee, the Ganajagaran Mancha, and Narayanganj Shangskritik Jot. The ‘renowned’ Osman family felt threatened by his activities. Rabbi says they killed his son to punish him. But he could not be beaten. Whoever can stand longer in the battlefield wins the battle. Let’s see who remains standing at the end of the day. Desperado means desperate in Spanish. Rafiur is now desperate. Since the day they found the distorted body of Tauki in the river he became the grief of all mothers, the fire of vengeance in all fathers and inspiration for protest for many brothers. Rabbi brought his strife to the forefront and made this a national issue. Kaiyum Choudhury was saying this, in a fruitless consolation to Tauki’s mother “we share your burden too”. A young school teacher told us that all students in his school know who killed Tauki. Rabbi told us that “People wanted to destroy the torture camp of the alleged murderer Shamim Osman’s nephew Ajmeri Osman. But we want justice, not vengeance.” Shamim Osman’s brother Nasim Osman MP wants to stamp people like Rabbi under his feet like insects. Last Sunday he warned in a public meeting “No one has survived going against us. We will have more power in the future. The insects, the ants and cockroaches that are still running around thinking they can do something to us, will get stamped under our feet. None of them will win against us.” (Prothom Alo, 7 October). In the country of 12 Bhuiyas many new Bhuiyas have sprouted recently. They think they own the state and they are the kings. If we cannot stop these people now we have very dark time ahead of us. Many other godfathers like the Osmans have the hidden desire of treading down on the ‘insects’. They think people are insects that you can obliterate when needed. But it is important what the Prime Minister thinks. The Prime Minister replied to the allegations about Osman put to her by saying “Shamim is important for the party too.” (Prothom Alo, 12 September, 2013). The movement against Tauki’s murderers is also the movement against other murderous godfathers. The country is being smothered by these criminals. The Mafias are sucking the country dry. These people took the life of bright young boy who was an artist, a poet, who thought “What I will be, no one has ever thought of.” This fight of monsters against humans is the most relevant human struggle right now. But much of it gets lost in the cacophony of fight for the power. The big political parties have become a sanctuary for these monsters. The people must help themselves and not look to these corrupt powers for solution. In 1955 an African America woman created a huge movement by protesting against his son’s murder. We are all supporting Rafiur Rabbi. But if the culprits are not brought to justice they will destroy Rafiur’s whole family, who they think as bugs that can be trodden upon without consequences. If Rabbi loses this battle against the monsters then it will be the defeat of Bangladesh itself. It will be the defeat of humanity. And if he does lose will we still have hope for our country?

Hernandez DNA found at murder scene Prosecutors say !

FALL RIVER — A marijuana joint found next to a slain Boston man in North Attleborough contained traces of both his DNA and the DNA of former New England Patriots star Aaron Hernandez, a Bristol County prosecutor said Thursday in an opening statement in Hernandez’s murder trial. A footprint at the murder scene in an industrial park also matched sneakers worn by Hernandez, and Hernandez’s DNA was found on a .45-caliber shell casing found in a car he had rented, Bristol County Assistant District Attorney Patrick Bomberg said. CONTINUE READING BELOW ▼ Bomberg said Hernandez and two associates in June 2013 drove the victim, Odin L. Lloyd, “to a secluded, isolated area in North Attleborough, a town where Odin Lloyd knew no one but the defendant and the defendant’s fiancee, Shayanna Jenkins. There Odin Lloyd was shot six times. He was killed, and he was left in a secluded area.” Hernandez, 25, a native of Bristol, Conn., has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder and weapons charges. The story of Hernandez, a wealthy young professional athlete who has allegedly squandered a bright future, has generated headlines nationwide. His trial is beginning just before his former team takes on the Seattle Seahawks in Sunday’s Super Bowl. Hernandez played in the team’s last Super Bowl appearance three years ago, a loss to the New York Giants. CONTINUE READING IT BELOW ▼ Who’s who in Hernandez case The former New England Patriots tight end has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the killing of Odin L. Lloyd. Photos: Murder trial starts Live updates from the trial Video: Hernandez in court Aaron Hernandez coverage Defense attorney Michael Fee, in his opening statement to the Bristol Superior Court jury, said, “Aaron Hernandez is an innocent man. ... Aaron Hernandez is not guilty.” Fee said the investigation of Hernandez had been “sloppy and unprofessional” and the evidence police had collected “should have led them in another direction.” “We are here today,” he said, “because police and the prosecution targeted Aaron Hernandez from the very beginning. As soon as they found out Aaron Hernandez — a celebrity football player for the New England Patriots – was a friend of Odin Lloyd’s, it was over.’’ After a break for lunch, the prosecution called two witnesses. One was the Bishop Feehan High School student who found Lloyd’s body. The court recessed for the day shortly before 4 p.m. Bomberg, painstakingly outlining the case built by the state against Hernandez, said Hernandez and his two associates, Ernest Wallace and Carlos Ortiz, had picked up Lloyd in Boston in the early morning hours of June 17, 2013. The four men drove to a North Attleborough industrial park. Less than 10 minutes later, only Hernandez and the two associates arrived at Hernandez ‘s home, which is not far from the industrial park, Bomberg said. He showed the jury video surveillance footage from Hernandez’s home system of the three men getting out of the car. Lloyd’s body was found later that day by the student. The murder weapon has not been found. Bomberg said Hernandez had not only orchestrated the murder, he had tried to cover it up. The prosecutor revealed little about a motive in the case. But he did say that when Hernandez and Lloyd were at a Boston nightclub a couple of evenings before the slaying, Lloyd saw some of his other friends there and Hernandez left the establishment “unhappy,” even though he exchanged no words with those friends of Lloyd. The prosecutor said a valet saw Hernandez standing that night outside a downtown Boston hotel, shoving a gun into the waistband of his pants and then covering the gun with his jacket before leaving the area with Lloyd. Fee acknowledged that Hernandez had set up a meeting with Lloyd two nights later, the night of the slaying, but he said Hernandez had simply wanted to go out partying with Lloyd, Wallace, and Ortiz. He said the evidence might show Hernandez was with Lloyd before he was killed, but there was no evidence he killed him. “Mere presence is not enough in our system,” he said. “We can’t be convicted of a crime just because we hang with the wrong people or are in the wrong place at the wrong time.” He also questioned whether Hernandez had a motive to kill Lloyd, saying Lloyd was “one of his partying pals” who was known as the “blunt master’’ because of the marijuana cigarettes he supplied to Hernandez. Fee also noted that Lloyd was dating Jenkins’s sister and could have ultimately ended up being Hernandez’s brother-in- law. “Aaron Hernandez is not the murderer of his friend,’’ Fee said. “In June 2013, Aaron Hernandez was planning his future, not a murder.’’ Bomberg spoke for about an hour, while Fee spoke for about 35 minutes. Among those in court Thursday was Jenkins. She was offered immunity by prosecutors, but there was no indication in the prosecutor’s opening statement that she would provide any testimony. Hernandez’s brother, D.J. Hernandez, was also there, along with Lloyd’s mother, Ursula Ward, and other Lloyd family members. After the opening statements, Superior Court Judge E. Susan Garsh, who is presiding, told jurors that prosecutors did not have to prove Hernandez pulled the trigger to secure a murder conviction. Rather, they must show that he “knowingly participated” in the slaying and intended to bring it to fruition, she said. Hernandez’s associates, Wallace and Ortiz, also face murder charges in the slaying and will be tried separately. They have pleaded not guilty. Hernandez also faces charges in a 2012 double slaying in Boston, as well as civil suits from the families of his alleged victims. Hernandez spent three seasons (2010-12) with the Patriots, appearing in 38 games. The most recent Super Bowl touchdown pass thrown by quarterback Tom Brady went to Hernandez, who caught a 12-yarder in the loss against the New York Giants three years ago. Hernandez was the Patriots’ leading receiver in Super Bowl XLVI, catching eight passes for 67 yards and the touchdown. In Phoenix Thursday, New England Patriot safety Devin McCourty said he still thinks about the team’s former tight end. “I’m sure today we will be, just because with the news of the trial starting,” McCourty said. “It’s kind of hard for you not to think about it, he was a former teammate of ours. But yeah, I think people think about it.’’ Michael Whitmer of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Maria Cramer can be reached at mcramer@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @globemcramer. Travis Andersen can be reached at tandersen@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @TAGlobe. John R. Ellement can be reached at ellement@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @JREbosglobe.
source: https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/01/29/aaron-hernandez-murder-trial-get-underway/I3pxtcGGb4dk39gNxbJibK/story.html

African Christian Vampire 'Mad Dog' Eating Muslim!(Video)

'Mad Dog' the cannibal pictured eating SECOND Muslim in as many weeks as Christians lynch and burn two men in Central African Republic

Shocking photographs have emerged of a cannibal by the name of Mad Dog eating the flesh of a lynched Muslim man for the second time in as many weeks. In one, 'Mad Dog' - real name Ouandja Magloire - cuts a portion of meat from the body of a murdered Muslim lying burning on a roundabout in the capital of the Central African Republic, with the body of another a few yards away. Another photograph shows him licking a bloodied knife as he stands over a body, wearing the same T-shirt he was pictured in during the previous act of cannibalism.

'Mad Dog' licks blood off a knife, as a crowd prepares to burn the body of a lynched Muslim man in Bangui The horrific images were taken in Bangui on Sunday. According to The Associated Press, the men were killed by residents of the Sango neighbourhood in revenge for the lynching of a taxi driver from Sango a day earlier. Two other Muslim passers-by escaped to the protection of French and African peacekeeping forces. The agency understands that Magloire didn't take part in the killings, but turned up in the aftermath. According to its source, he is the only person in the Central African Republic known to be carrying out acts of cannibalism.

Source:www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2542662/Footage-emerged-cannibal-eating-leg-Muslim-Central-African-Republic.html

The face of Myanmar Buddhist Terrorist(video)

Sri Lanka on 2012 Tuesday banned the sale of the latest issue of Time magazine because of the newsweekly’s feature article on terrorism, describing recent clashes between Buddhists and Muslims. We publish below the Full text of the cover story

“The Face of Buddhist Terror”

in July 01, 2013 TIME magazine; The Face of Buddhist Terror It’s a faith famous for its pacifism and tolerance. But in several of Asia’s Buddhist-majority nations, monks are inciting bigotry and violence — mostly against Muslims By Hannah Beech / Meikhtila, Burma, And Pattani, Thailand

His face as still and serene as a statue’s, the Buddhist monk who has taken the title “the Burmese bin Laden” begins his sermon. Hundreds of worshippers sit before him, palms pressed together, sweat trickling down their sticky backs. On cue, the crowd chants with the man in burgundy robes, the mantras drifting through the sultry air of a temple in Mandalay, Burma’s second biggest city after Rangoon. It seems a peaceful scene, but Wirathu’s message crackles with hate. “Now is not the time for calm,” the monk intones, as he spends 90 minutes describing the many ways in which he detests the minority Muslims in this Buddhist-majority land. “Now is the time to rise up, to make your blood boil.” Buddhist blood is boiling in Burma, also known as Myanmar–and plenty of Muslim blood is being spilled. Over the past year, Buddhist mobs have targeted members of the minority faith, and incendiary rhetoric from Wirathu–he goes by one name–and other hard-line monks is fanning the flames of religious chauvinism. Scores of Muslims have been killed, according to government statistics, although international human-rights workers put the number in the hundreds. Much of the violence is directed at the Rohingya, a largely stateless Muslim group in Burma’s far west that the U.N. calls one of the world’s most persecuted people. The communal bloodshed has spread to central Burma, where Wirathu, 46, lives and preaches his virulent sermons. The radical monk sees Muslims, who make up at least 5% of Burma’s estimated 60 million people, as a threat to the country and its culture. “[Muslims] are breeding so fast, and they are stealing our women, raping them,” he tells me. “They would like to occupy our country, but I won’t let them. We must keep Myanmar Buddhist.” Such hate speech threatens the delicate political ecosystem in a country peopled by at least 135 ethnic groups that has only recently been unshackled from nearly half a century of military rule. Already some government officials are calling for implementation of a ban, rarely enforced during the military era, on Rohingya women’s bearing more than two children. And many Christians in the country’s north say recent fighting between the Burmese military and Kachin insurgents, who are mostly Christian, was exacerbated by the widening religious divide. Radical Buddhism is thriving in other parts of Asia too. This year in Sri Lanka, Buddhist nationalist groups with links to high-ranking officialdom have gained prominence, with monks helping orchestrate the destruction of Muslim and Christian property. And in Thailand’s deep south, where a Muslim insurgency has claimed some 5,000 lives since 2004, the Thai army trains civilian militias and often accompanies Buddhist monks when they leave their temples. The commingling of soldiers and monks–some of whom have armed themselves–only heightens the alienation felt by Thailand’s minority Muslims. Although each nation’s history dictates the course radical Buddhism has taken within its borders, growing access to the Internet means that prejudice and rumors are instantly inflamed with each Facebook post or tweet. Violence can easily spill across borders. In Malaysia, where hundreds of thousands of Burmese migrants work, several Buddhist Burmese were killed in June–likely in retribution, Malaysian authorities say, for the deaths of Muslims back in Burma. In the reckoning of religious extremism– Hindu nationalists, Muslim militants, fundamentalist Christians, ultra-Orthodox Jews–Buddhism has largely escaped trial. To much of the world, it is synonymous with nonviolence and loving kindness, concepts propagated by Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, 2,500 years ago. But like adherents of any other religion, Buddhists and their holy men are not immune to politics and, on occasion, the lure of sectarian chauvinism. When Asia rose up against empire and oppression, Buddhist monks, with their moral command and plentiful numbers, led anticolonial movements. Some starved themselves for their cause, their sunken flesh and protruding ribs underlining their sacrifice for the laity. Perhaps most iconic is the image of Thich Quang Duc, a Vietnamese monk sitting in the lotus position, wrapped in flames, as he burned to death in Saigon while protesting the repressive South Vietnamese regime 50 years ago. In 2007, Buddhist monks led a foiled democratic uprising in Burma: images of columns of clerics bearing upturned alms bowls, marching peacefully in protest against the junta, earned sympathy around the world, if not from the soldiers who slaughtered them. But where does political activism end and political militancy begin? Every religion can be twisted into a destructive force poisoned by ideas that are antithetical to its foundations. Now it’s Buddhism’s turn. Mantra of Hate Sitting cross-legged on a raised platform at the New Masoeyein monastery in Mandalay, next to a wall covered by life-size portraits of himself, the Burmese bin Laden expounds on his worldview. U.S. President Barack Obama has “been tainted by black Muslim blood.” Arabs have hijacked the U.N., he believes, although he sees no irony in linking his name to that of an Arab terrorist. About 90% of Muslims in Burma are “radical, bad people,” says Wirathu, who was jailed for seven years for his role in inciting anti-Muslim pogroms in 2003. He now leads a movement called 969–the figure represents various attributes of the Buddha–which calls on Buddhists to fraternize only among themselves and shun people of other faiths. “Taking care of our own religion and race is more important than democracy,” says Wirathu. It would be easy to dismiss Wirathu as an outlier with little doctrinal basis for his bigotry. But he is charismatic and powerful, and his message resonates. Among the country’s majority Bamar ethnic group, as well as across Buddhist parts of Asia, there’s a vague sense that their religion is under siege–that Islam, having centuries ago conquered the Buddhist lands of Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan and Afghanistan, now seeks new territory. Even without proof, Buddhist nationalists stoke fears that local Muslim populations are increasing faster than their own, and they worry about Middle Eastern money pouring in to build new mosques. In Burma, the democratization process that began in 2011 with the junta’s giving way to a quasi-civilian government has also allowed extremist voices to proliferate. The trouble began last year in the far west, where machete-wielding Buddhist hordes attacked Rohingya villages; 70 Muslims were slaughtered in a daylong massacre in one hamlet, according to Human Rights Watch. The government has done little to check the violence, which has since migrated to other parts of the country. In late March, the central town of Meikhtila burned for days, with entire Muslim quarters razed by Buddhist mobs after a monk was killed by Muslims. (The official death toll: two Buddhists and at least 40 Muslims.) Thousands of Muslims are still crammed into refugee camps that journalists are forbidden to enter. In the shadow of a burned-down mosque, I was able to meet the family of Abdul Razak Shahban, one of at least 20 students at a local Islamic school who were killed. “My son was killed because he was Muslim, nothing else,” Razak’s mother Rahamabi told me. Temple and State In the deep south of Burma’s neighbor Thailand, it is the Buddhists who complain of being targeted for their faith. This part of the country used to be part of a Malay sultanate before staunchly Buddhist Thailand annexed it early last century, and Muslims make up at least 80% of the population. Since a separatist insurgency intensified in 2004, many Buddhists have been targeted because their positions–such as teachers, soldiers and government workers–are linked with the Thai state. Dozens of monks have been attacked too. Now the Buddhists have overwhelming superiority in arms: the Thai military and other security forces have moved into the wat, as Thai Buddhist temples are known. If Buddhists feel more protected by the presence of soldiers in their temples, it sends quite another signal to the Muslim population. “[The] state is wedding religion to the military,” says Michael Jerryson, an assistant professor of religious studies at Youngstown State University in Ohio and author of a book about Buddhism’s role in the southern-Thailand conflict. Muslims too are scared: more of them have perished in the violence than Buddhists. (By proportion of population, more Buddhists have died, however.) Yet Buddhists are the ones who receive the greater state protection, and I listen to monk after monk heighten tensions by telling me that Muslims are using mosques to store weapons or that every imam carries a gun. “Islam is a religion of violence,” says Phratong Jiratamo, a former marine turned monk in the town of Pattani. “Everyone knows this.” It’s a sentiment the Burmese bin Laden would endorse. I ask Wirathu how he reconciles the peaceful sutras of his faith with the anti-Muslim violence spreading across his Bamar-majority homeland. “In Buddhism, we are not allowed to go on the offensive,” he tells me, as if he is lecturing a child. “But we have every right to protect and defend our community.” Later, as he preaches to an evening crowd, I listen to him compel smiling housewives, students, teachers, grandmothers and others to repeat after him, “I will sacrifice myself for the Bamar race.” It’s hard to imagine that the Buddha would have approved. – Time- Myanmar 969 terrorist kill Muslim in burma mitkhla

Not have Internet!

Something on the internet that will not be there at one time. About the future of the Internet, Google's executive chairman Eric smith recently made such comments. World Economic Forum in Switzerland to predict the panel asked him about the web, he said, "I would say in general, the internet will be lost." According to an AFP report, Eric smith said so many IP (Internet Protocol) address is ... so much instruments, sensors and wearable products,which will be in touch with the people that do not have the Internet. " Smith explains, "Adherence to highlight the presence of the people all of the time will be considered. Suppose, we have entered into a cell that is Immortal business knowing. Consent to my house, which is in contact with me of my house, which started to work on. " Smith said, 'Very individuality, very timely communication and great fun to be able to come up in front of us in the world. "This panel discussion during the search market, Google's domination by Eric smith said the ongoing dispute. Google's dominance in the market,to undermine the European Union fighting the case. Other businesses in the last year, Google's search engine to separate from the business of the European Parliament are discussed. 'The Future of the Digital Economy, "the head of the panel was to manage Facebook serila officer. Serila syandabarge said, "Technology is changing so rapidly. Everyone in the world is worried about jobs. But technology does not just create jobs in this industry; Increases beyond the workplace. " Do not lose the opportunity of employment with the issue smith "This debate is going on for hundreds of years. Many halacasa the tractors came out. But in the end it was to bring the solution to a global problem. Means equal opportunity for everyone to create solutions to global problems. ' Everyone has a personal opinion One of this year's World Economic Forum was a discussion topic of global growth, the issue of how to divide.global equality provision of the world of work can take advantage of the connection technology experts opined. Microsoft chief executive true nadela said, with all the benefits of the technology has spread into what everyone? The advantages of the technology that will be able to confirm to us before. " True nadela said, "I am optimistic, however, because there is no doubt. If the technology to do business, but to be optimistic. I think, before the human resources must be made. Technology makes people powerful enough to do something great. " Serila syandabarga "The Origin of the Internet era, the use of the internet was hiding-curiye thing. But now everyone sharing all things, and is visible to everyone. Now everyone has their own opinions. Everyone can post now. To share their comments and feedback on any topic which was not possible before. " Smith said, in favor of any country, banking, communication, ethics, and human contact with the subject can not be suppressed. Now none of the advantages of this connection can not be cut off from the world. No it will not work. Serila syandabarga said, "Now, just 40 percent of the people going to the Internet at this time. We have 40 percent of the rest of the Internet, can be reached at the 50, 60 or 70 percent of the people is not difficult to reach. two decades, the Internet comes this ground breaking changes, but the probability of Internet growth would be nice to also ensure that it is well. "

WhatsApp plus real or fake?

Buying a mobile messaging service WhatsApp could be exposed to a new version, which will be called WhatsApp plus. Said recently in the national news. WhatsApp messaging application associated with the new version will be present, or any information about what would be different in a new application WhatsApp, authorities said. However, the technology is being called on various websites, WhatsApp will be plus much more fun. The new theme will be added with the new emoticons. It will add the ability to exchange large files. Currently in to Whatsapps large files can not be exchanged.WhatsApp Plus version is not clear whether the price of free.predict the current WhatsApp users can download it free of charge at. Earlier, India WhatsApp business chief "Neeraj Arora'' said,WhatsApp Authority wants to bring an excellent service, which will be used by millions of people, and the profit and loss would be more than the price. ' Currently, 70 million users at least once per month using WhatsApp.Now, 70 million per month using WhatsApp. In August last year, there were 60 million WhatsApp users. Recently, a Facebook post, WhatsApp CEO 'Jan kauma' said. He WhatsApp messaging is now day 30 billion. Monthly 70 million user accounts held in the world's largest social networking is one of the sites sharing the message of this application. Beware of fake WhatsApp Plus WhatsApp WhatsApp plus the face of the authorities officially raised voice. But in the meantime exposed to download an App for Android WhatsApp Placer name, which is false.WhatsApp WhatsApp authority or the owner of this app was made under Facebook. There are many websites such cheating traps. Experts are encouraged to do so WhatsApp Plus now to download it, because 'Myalaoy yara purna'. Download this app if the personal safety would be in jeopardy.

Google Glass Company pulls Glass out of the limelight to rework it

Is it too late for Google Glass to become the big hit that people are excited to be seen wearing and will use in their everyday lives, taking video of their work projects and vacation adventures? Pulling Glass out of the limelight and rethinking

Democrats defend naming Muslim to House Intelligence panel

WASHINGTON (AP) — Top Democrats are defending their appointment of a Muslim congressman to the House Intelligence Committee after protests erupted on social media, warning the move is dangerous. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi this week appointed Rep. Andre Carson of Indiana to the panel, which oversees the government's intelligence departments and activities. Much of the business that comes before the committee is classified. Anti-Muslim protests erupted on Twitter and other social media with complaints that exposing American secrets to Carson could be dangerous. Democrats widely rejected that view. Pelosi said Carson is the only member of Congress to have served in a Department of Homeland Security Fusion Center, which provides intelligence sharing and training across levels of government. Carson also serves on the House Armed Services Committee. Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the senior Democrat on the panel, called the protests un- American. He said including Muslim Americans in public policy issues is "an essential element in preventing the kind of alienation that has made too many young European Muslims vulnerable to extremism." Rep. Joseph Crowley of New York, vice chairman of the Democratic Caucus, called on his colleagues to renounce the attacks. "We will never be able to grow as a society if we allow this kind of hatred and division to go unchecked," Crowley wrote in a letter to his colleagues.
Source:yahoonews

Pope's Charlie Hebdo comments do not justify attack

MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Pope Francis said there are limits to freedom of speech, especially when it insults or ridicules someone's faith, in comments that the Vatican later said Friday did not mean justifying the attack on the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo. Francis spoke about the Paris terror attacks while en route to the Philippines on Thursday, defending free speech as not only a fundamental human right but a duty to speak one's mind for the sake of the common good. But he said there were limits. By way of example, he referred to Alberto Gasbarri, who organizes papal trips and was standing by his side aboard the papal plane. "If my good friend Dr. Gasbarri says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch," Francis said half-jokingly, throwing a mock punch his way. "It's normal. You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others." His pretend punch aside, Francis by no means said the violent attack on Charlie Hebdo was justified. Quite the opposite: He said such horrific violence in God's name couldn't be justified and was an "aberration." But he said a reaction of some sort was to be expected. The Rev. Thomas Rosica, who collaborates with the Vatican press office, issued a statement early Friday stressing that the pope was by no means justifying the attack on Charlie Hebdo. "Pope Francis has not advocated violence with his words on the flight," he said in a statement. He said Francis' words were "spoken colloquially and in a friendly, intimate manner among colleagues and friends on the journey." He noted that Francis has spoken out clearly against the Paris attacks and that violence in God's name can never be justified. Many people around the world have defended the right of Charlie Hebdo to publish inflammatory cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed in the wake of the massacre by Islamic extremists at its Paris offices and subsequent attack on a kosher supermarket in which three gunmen killed 17 people. Others, though, have noted that in virtually all societies, freedom of speech has its limits, from laws against Holocaust denial to racially motivated hate speech. Recently the Vatican and four prominent French imams issued a joint declaration that, while denouncing the Paris attacks, urged the media to treat religions with respect. Francis, who has called on Muslim leaders in particular to speak out against Islamic extremism, went a step further Thursday when asked by a French journalist about whether there were limits when freedom of expression meets freedom of religion. "There are so many people who speak badly about religions or other religions, who make fun of them, who make a game out of the religions of others," he said. "They are provocateurs. And what happens to them is what would happen to Dr. Gasbarri if he says a curse word against my mother. There is a limit." In the wake of the Paris attacks, the Vatican has sought to downplay reports that it is a potential target for Islamic extremists, saying it is being vigilant but has received no specific threat. Francis said he was concerned primarily for the safety of the faithful who come to see him in droves, and said he had spoken to Vatican security officials who are taking "prudent and secure measures." "I am worried, but you know I have a defect: a good dose of carelessness. I'm careless about these things," he said. But he admitted that in his prayers, he had asked that if something were to happen to him that "it doesn't hurt, because I'm not very courageous when it comes to pain. I'm very timid." He added, "I'm in God's hands."